🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". A law is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a comparable action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged guardians to block their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. While it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these services, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a useful first step," commented the European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. An organization set up by the relatives of a girl who died after encountering dangerous social media material suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional access requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from some figures to copy the Australian example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Outside of the West, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, international agencies strike a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion continues, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.